![]() and I can't afford having both high end DSLR and MF backs. On the other hand for outside action shots, MF is not the way to go, even if I wonder sometime. This goes the cheaper way between APS size sensors and MF. So, back to your question, the main reason I do not use tilt-shift lense is that they are not.wide enough.īTW this also one of the reason why I went to FF. Hence I cannot argue technically a lot, but I'm sure some others around here will do! So, perhaps, the first thing to consider is, perhaps, the final use and size of the image.įirst of all, I'm a complete self made man (may be that's the reason why I like so much good forums and why I'm so thankfull to them!), I left school before being graduated for a transatlantic crossing on a sail boat. If one, however, one, takes pictures for a Real Estate company at a small fee, to be only in low resolution, then Photoshop may be perfectly adequate. Cameras like Alpa or LF have lenses with larger image circles and the ability to shift the lens, to get the top of the building in the frame, alter the angle, removing convergence according to Schleimflug principles or change the plane of focus and so forth. So here, photographers search for the best lenses and often are using medium format and large format, (LF). ![]() For architectural pictures for clients with $100,000,000 buildings, they are often looking for a perfect image with detail and clarity from top to bottom and from left to right without distortion or compromises. ![]() It all depends on the the final use of the image and the standards you require. Since I'm here, I'll add, if I may, a few words before Nicolas gives his more considered reply. ![]() Click to expand.Hi Kris and "Welcome to OPF!" ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |